The Strand Magazine : an illustrated monthly. Vol. 1, no. 3, March 1891 / edited by George Newnes.

Date:
1891
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: The Strand Magazine : an illustrated monthly. Vol. 1, no. 3, March 1891 / edited by George Newnes. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    25/132 (page 231)
    Joshua, so far as the original goes, is a thing of the past. The mystery as to its sudden disappearance has never been fully cleared up, but it is indisputable that the Earl of Derby of the period had this picture painted of his wife, that he quarrelled with her, and that just at this time the picture vanished. Little room is left for doubt that the Earl himself destroyed the work. The other is that of Miss Gale, painted when she was fifteen, a can¬ vas worth at least /5,°°o (page 232). She married Admiral Gardner, who was so much attached to his wife, that when¬ ever he went to sea he always took the picture with him, and had it conspicuously hung up in his cabin. His vessel was wrecked off' the West Indies, and though the Admiral was saved, the ship, with “Miss Gale” in the cabin, went down. There it lay at the bottom of the ocean for a considerable period, until at last attempts were made to recover it. This was successfully accomplished, though the can¬ vas Avas much damaged, and was afterwards reduced in length and breadth. The pic¬ ture seems to have been peculiarly unfor¬ tunate, both on land and sea, for in 1864 it was damaged again by the Midland Railway. Until recently it was in the possession of the Rev. Allen Gardner Corn¬ wall. The fact of a picture of fabulous value being picked up in a pawnbroker’s shop, or veritable gems being discovered fastened with tin-tacks to the wall of a servant’s bedroom, is alone sufficient cause to rank them among pictures with a history. But surely no such remarkable instance of innocence regarding the real value of a work has been known for a long time as that which came to light in a West End picture dealer’s shop a few weeks ago. The story is a simple one. A painter—presumably an amateur—ran short of canvas, and, living in the country, some days must needs elapse before he could get a fresh supply. Hanging up in his house was an old work, representing an ancient - looking gentleman. He had hung there a long time, practi¬ cally unnoticed. To meet the emergency, the painter conceived a happy thought, and one which he immediately pro¬ ceeded to carry into effect. Why not paint on the back of the ancient - looking gentleman who had hung un¬ cared-for for so long ? The can¬ vas was taken off the stretcher, turned round, and re-stretched, the back of the picture being used on which to paint a copy of Sir Joshua Reynolds’ “Age of Innocence.” Innocence there truly was—for the painting which the amateur had screened from view turned out to be a Gainsborough. The original Gainsborough is at the present moment at the back ot the newly-painted picture, and is partly hidden by the stretcher, as shown in the sketch (page 233), made as it lay by the counter in the dealer’s shop. One artist might be singled out of whom it may safely be said that he never painted THE COUNTESS of derbv. By Sir Joshua Reynolds.