Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton].

  • Thornton, Robert John, 1768?-1837
Date:
1806
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton]. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    35/526
    General inference drawn from this case by Dr. Moseley. - 371 Neglect of the Anti-vaccinists to obtain the testimony of medical mev as regards their reported failures . ib. Mr. Morrison’s letter ; He states his conviction of the superiority of the Cow-pock over the Small-pox inoculation . • • . . ' . 372 • The child vaccinated with stale matter . . • 373 . Mr. Morrison’s excellent reasoning for always using ..jf young matter • • • • • - ; The evil in this case supposed by Mr. Morrison to oii-. p - ginate from aof constitution ... ,4^,.; S74 Reason why such constitutions are less affected with the Cow-pock . . • . •. ' Doubt as to the right Vaccination ever producing an^ derangement of the kind . . . Objection to the use of stale matter long since expo^ (Noie.J XXIV, THE CLAPHAM FATAL CASES, pLined ni Severe animadversions on Dr. Pearson from Mr. Creaser^ , 37^ Experience of Mr. Creaser, as regards the us^ oC.sfrd^, jl^ vaccine matter vy ■: v XXV. XXVI. TWO CASES advanced ^ The case of New’s .child; no objection..^gainsjt th^gc-^^^ neral practice of Vaccination ■■*u ■ 'iriv b'lo’-flc XXVII. THE PIMLICO CASE !: ib. The statements of Dr. Moseley and Rowley , ^ . ^^.^ 382 ' A compleat reCutjition. of this case . 383 . Dr. Pearson’s senUmcnt respecting any cr,edit being given to the AntUy^iccinists, opposed as they have been, and are still, by almost the,united faculty . _ . 384 ^, Dr. ^ossi^lfy’s laipe endeavour to defend this case, as one Adverse to Vaccinatipn ., . , , ,, ib, j, The sharaeful credulity of Dr. Moseley , . , i , . 385 J^^^XVHL THE HOLLES-STREET CASE ib. b. Cow-hairs appear in the body of the child frpmVaccinatlon ib.