Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton].

  • Thornton, Robert John, 1768?-1837
Date:
1806
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton]. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    19/526
    Mr. Hey’s letter to Dr, Thornton on these cases, show- ing the statements to be incorrect Certificates to prove that one of these persons never had the pvopcr Cow-pock . . . • • Mr. Brooke acknowledges his ignorance of the right . Vaccination ■Success of Mr. Hey with the Cow-pock Diminution of deaths from the Small-pox at Leeds Reason of tlfis diminution . . • • ' • Diminution of deaths from the Small-pox in London owincr to Vaccination . . . • • O The extirpation of the Small-pox in a metropolis from Vaccination shewn by the evidence of fact, as proved at Vienna (Note.) ...... — Berlin (Noie.J Paris (Notc.J Opposing sentlrnent to such doctrine, by Dr. Rowley ('Noie.J ....... admirably ridiculed by Aculeus Destructive effects arising from the publications of Doc- tors Moseley and Rowley Annual deaths from the Small-pox in London, averaged The deaths from the Small-pox in 1806 Doctors Moseley jand Rowley compared to WagstafFe and Massey . . . Account of these men, and the opposition they for- merly raised to the Small-pox Inoculation, when ' first introduced JNoie.J .... Influence of their publication on the progress of Vari- olous Inoculation fNoie.J . . . , . Origin of the story of one of the failures at Leeds, a mere report ......•• The deduction from the Oxford or Yorkshire cases, shewn to be unten-able . . . • • 9. A SUPPOSED BRISTOL CASE Pr. Moseley's statement . 92 ib. 95 ib. 96 ib. 97 97 ib. ib, ib. ib. -ib. 100 ib. ib. 101 ib. 102