Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton].

  • Thornton, Robert John, 1768?-1837
Date:
1806
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Vaccinae vindicia; or, defence of vaccination: containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination ... / [Robert John Thornton]. Source: Wellcome Collection.

    17/526
    pox, suspected at first as being inimical to the Cow- pock (Note.) ...... 50 I lis frightful report respecting Vaccination (Note.) ib, Ilis early recantation (Note.) . ... ih. Dr. Pearson made partizan in error by Dr. Woodville f^^ote.) 51 Dr, Jenner opposes the statement of these men as re- spects Vaccination (Note.) .... 53 The fatal consequence of such error at Petyvorth, which makes the true natu-re of the Cow-pock to become better known (Note.) . . . . Ib. The noble example of Dr. Woodville, who publishes a faithful report, and dies blessing Dr. Jenner, and pmying for the Cow-pock (Note.) . . 54 Such an example given, in order to induce Mr. Daniel Sutton to follow it, and to obviate the effect^ which his non-conversion may have on the public • mind (Note.) -£5 T he situations, lucrative and honourable, and the emi- nent qualifications of Dr. Moseley, as stated by Dr. Rowley (Note.) The evidence of Dr. Moseley, as given to the Committee of the House of Commons . . . ■ . 57* Remarks on this evidence . . . . . 58 Erroneous statement of Dr. Moseley respecting the pre- sent state of the Cow-pock .... 59 These misrepresentations corrected . . CO 4, 5. THE MALDEN CASES ... 62 Dr. Moseley’s statement . . ■ , . . Whence obtained (Note.) . . . . . 63 Refuted in a public newspaper .... ib.- One of these cases never existed . . . . Ci Eomlinson s letter acknowledging the cause of the failure in the other case, from his total ignorance of the fight practice of Vaccination (using old matter) . 65 A 2